ADVERT
US2 min(s) read
Published 11:06 17 Jan 2019 GMT
Marie Jean Pierre, a 60-year-old former dishwasher at the Conrad Miami hotel, was awarded an incredible $21.5 million this week after claiming she faced discrimination by being forced to work on Sundays.
Pierre worked at the hotel, which at the time was managed by Hilton, for more than a decade before being fired in 2016. The reason the company gave for letting Pierre go was that she kept missing Sunday shifts in order to go to church. Previously, the hotel had respected the dishwasher's commitments and given her an exemption from working on Sundays between 2009 and 2015, but went back on this agreement and began "demanding" that she work on any day they requested.
Rather than find a new job, the 60-year-old continued at Conrad, but didn't show up for shifts that coincided with church. And now she's been handed tens of millions of dollars for doing so.
"I love God. No work on Sunday, because Sunday I honour God," Pierre said in an interview with her lawyer, Marc Brumer, who was obviously very happy with the jury's decision to award his client compensation.
"They accommodated her for seven years and they easily could have accommodated her [again], but instead of doing that, they set her up for absenteeism and threw her out," Brumer said. "She’s a soldier of Christ. She was doing this for all the other workers who are being discriminated against."
Pierre was able to convince the jury that her commitment to her religion was genuine, and therefore her workplace had violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which protects workers from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex or national origin.
Indeed, the dishwasher has always lived as a committed Christian, and has done missionary work in the past.
$536,000 of the sum was awarded to Pierre as compensation for lost wages, emotional pain and "mental anguish", and the remaining $20 million was to account for punitive damages. Because of a state cap on payouts such as these, however, she is likely receive much less.
"I asked for $50 million, knowing that I was capped at $300,000," Brumer disclosed this week. "I didn’t do this for money. I did this to right the wrongs." He continued:
"This was not about money. This was about sending a message to other corporations whether big or small. Whatever size you are, if you’re going to take the blood and sweat of your workers, you better accommodate them or let them at least believe in their religious beliefs."
Meanwhile, the hotel company has said that it is disappointed by the decision and intends to appeal. "During Ms. Pierre’s ten years with the hotel, multiple concessions were made to accommodate her personal and religious commitments," Hilton said in a statement.
This legal battle is a huge deal - not just for Pierre, but for other individuals who feel they are being discriminated against for their race, religion, sex or national origin. The precedent has been set that employers cannot treat individuals unfairly on these grounds, and should expect to face consequences if they do.
lifestyle3 min(s) read
Published 16:26 01 Aug 2021 GMT
A bride and groom forced their guests to wash dirty dishes after dinner as they couldn't afford to hire help.
The story of the wedding from hell was shared on Reddit by u/Kidpixthrowaway, who explained that the reason the couple's budget didn't cover the washing up was that they had blown all their money on the lavish venue and the bride's couture gown.
The Reddit user recalled: "The bride (a relative of mine) and groom have gone all out, renting a gorgeous and expensive venue for their wedding. Beautiful ceremony, lovely pictures, etc. The buffet line and tables have been set up on the screened porch of the building. Food looks great."
However, it later came out that the newlyweds had decided to "self-cater". This basically meant that the dishes and glassware had been rented out and that if they weren't returned clean by the end of the evening, the couple would lose their deposit.
The Reddit user goes on to explain that the maid of honor directed some of the wedding guests to the kitchen and informed them that they were expected to wash all the dishes stacked before them.
The user explained: "So I and about nine other guests spend most of the reception in the kitchen, elbow-deep in soap and water. We miss the first dance and the cutting of the cake, which turns out to be for the best because (wait for it) they hadn’t purchased enough cake for everyone either."
What's more, the couple ended up divorcing a mere three years later. The original poster explained that they had learned a good lesson that day and declined their invitation to the bride's second wedding.
Needless to say, fellow Reddit users were outraged by their audacity to invite "loved ones" to their wedding only to force them to wash up during the actual event.
One person wrote: "That is INSANE. Imagine inviting a bunch of folks then having the gall to tell them 1/4 of them will DELIBERATELY be left hungry. Including cake!"
A number of people claimed they would have refused to wash dishes, with one user writing: "I'll be honest. Unless they were f***ed over by the staff ( ie: no one showed up for some reason), I would probably leave and not wash dishes for those cheapskates. It's not a church luncheon, it's a wedding. There are different expectations."
A different user, however, admitted they probably would have washed the dishes, writing: "Honestly, I probably would have washed dishes too, due to being too 'wtf is going on what do I do???' to actually say anything."
us3 min(s) read
Published 11:57 10 Apr 2026 GMT
A Chick-fil-A employee has gone viral after making an incredible decision when he stumbled across $10,000 during a routine shift.
Jayden Cintron, 18, was working on Good Friday morning at a restaurant in Kinston, North Carolina, when he discovered two white envelopes sitting next to the toilet.
One was labeled for First Citizens Bank and the other for Truist Bank, and inside, he found a total of $9,333 in cash.
But instead of keeping the money, Cintron chose to turn it in, later telling WITN: "My first thought was just like… okay, no, this isn’t happening. Something is wrong."
After taking a moment to process what he had found, Cintron brought the envelopes straight to the restaurant’s human resources department.
He later explained that his decision was rooted in his faith. "That’s not what Jesus would’ve done. That’s not what God would’ve wanted," he said, adding elsewhere: "I was in the right place at the right time, but more than that, my faith teaches me to do what’s right and to care for others."
"Knowing how devastating it would be to lose something like that, I just wanted to make sure it got back to its owner. I’m grateful I could help and I’m humbled by the response," he continued.
He also made it clear he had no interest in personal gain, saying: "I don't want anything out of this,” and adding: "I did this because that's what Jesus would do...Money is useless without character."
The owner of the money later came forward through the police to claim the cash and offered Cintron a $500 reward for his honesty. However, the teenager refused the offer.
After being encouraged multiple times to accept the money, he eventually agreed. His actions drew praise from both his employer and local authorities.
"True leadership, you know, true integrity is doing the right thing when no one is watching," said John McPhaul. "Jay did that in this case, and he should be commended for it."
Kinston Chick-fil-A Owner-Operator John McPhaul told PEOPLE: "We’re grateful for Team Members like Jaydon who demonstrate integrity and a genuine care for others."
"Acts like this reflect the values our restaurants aim to uphold each day, and we’re proud to see that lived out here at Chick-fil-A Kinston," they added.
Kinston Police Chief Keith Goyette echoed the sentiment, saying: "a lot of people will, unfortunately, take that money and run with it, but kudos to that employee at Chick-Fil-A, [he] definitely deserves a reward."
lifestyle3 min(s) read
Published 16:15 29 Dec 2023 GMT
A woman has taken to TikTok to share her paycheck after working 70 hours at a bar... and it's staggeringly low.
I dare say that most of us want more money than we currently earn, but that's just human nature, isn't it?
Once you've got one yacht, you're going to want two - maybe, I've never owned a yacht.
Either way, money makes the world go around, and as much as it causes a lot of stress at times, it's also important to have so you can live a comfortable life. But it would appear that some places rely on the generosity of others to pay their staff.
Austin-based bartender Aaliyah Cortez bared her payslip to TikTok, unveiling the grim reality of her earnings after a grueling 70-hour workweek.
Cortez, employed at a local sports bar for over a year, disclosed that her base pay stood at a meager $2.13 per hour, emphasizing the critical role tips play in her ability to make ends meet.
The video, posted in January 2020, breaks down her compensation, revealing a shocking sum of $9.28 after factoring in federal taxes, social security, and Medicare.
"So this is why you should always tip your bartenders and servers, anyone who waits on you or provides a service for you," Cortez conveyed in the video.
Speaking to BuzzFeed, Cortez criticized the current state of the service industry, expressing her desire for fair and consistent compensation.
"It’s not right that we have to do this, but I wanted to shed some light on the issue and inform the public about the importance of tipping," she said.
Cortez's plea for adequate pay and consistency struck a chord with viewers, who flocked to the comments to offer their thoughts.
One person said: "No mam, your bar/restaurant is getting free labor and that's not ok," to which Cortez responded: "It’s bc we get tips, our tips are supposed to amount to minimum wage or more, if not then they must pay us minimum wage."
Another user said: "This is why the US should be like EVERY other developed nation and not have a tip culture. Businesses should pay your wages. Tips shouldn't be a thing."
Another comment really captured the culture of tipping, as they said: "I always tip 20%. If I can’t afford 20% I don’t go to a restaurant."
It's worth noting that the paycheck also reveals that Cortez made $700 in cash tips, but it opens up the ongoing debate about whether customers should have to tip to supplement a server's wages.
What do you think?
us4 min(s) read
Published 15:36 21 Feb 2024 GMT
A server who recently went viral after receiving a $10,000 tip has revealed the reason why the establishment has fired her.
Earlier this month, worker Linsey Boyd was working a shift at the Mason Jar Cafe in Benton Harbour, located in southern Michigan, when a customer came in and racked up a bill of $32, as reported by WSBT.
Normally, customers are expected to tip between $3-$6 for that specific bill, however, when the man finished his food, he left a staggering tip of $10,000 for the staff.
The act of kindness was far from random as the customer - who wishes to remain anonymous - revealed that he was in town for a friend's memorial service, and wanted to honor his friend with the good deed.
The unnamed man had requested Boyd to split the gift amongst the entire team, which came out to a little over $1,100 for each employee, so that's exactly what she did.
"I just gave him a hug. I didn't even know his name at that point, but I gave him a hug. He then told me he left her a memorial of someone very dear to him and he wanted to do something kind and generous in her name," Boyd told the outlet.
Later, the cafe shared a now-deleted post of the receipt with the handwritten tip and the man's last name removed. In response, many people and publications reacted to the heartwarming story, per the Detroit Free Press.
However, what was supposed to be an upbeat story took a negative turn as Boyd claimed in a now-deleted Facebook post that drama began to unfold inside the cafe days after receiving the sizeable payment.
The kitchen staff at the Benton Harbor restaurant reportedly felt aggrieved that they weren't receiving a cut of the tip.
In an interview with The Guardian, Boyd's lawyer Jennifer McManus revealed that Boyd informed her superiors about the upset and they allegedly asked her to name the people who vocalized their frustration.
In response, Boyd allegedly said: "I’m not going to give any of their names … because I don’t want to create a bigger issue. I would just like some assistance in getting this resolved."
According to McManus, the restaurant fired Boyd after she insisted on keeping the identities of those angered by the tip situation under wraps.
She alleged that management then asked her to take a mental health day off, as well as a night shift. They also instructed her not to show up to work on a Monday.
The waitress messaged the restaurant that same day to ask if she was being told "in a professional way to not come back," and then on Tuesday she was told via phone that she was indeed fired.
"One week I’m such an amazing, hardworking employee, awesome mother… couldn’t have happened to a better person," Boyd's post reportedly read. "Now, I’m without a job, for the first time since I was 15 years old."
The restaurant’s owners, Able Martinez, and Jayme Cousins, have refuted the ex-employee's claims, stating that the dismissal had nothing to do with the $10K tip as Boyd shared it with the rest of the staff. They explained that they could not reveal the details surrounding the release due to labor laws.
The couple said the restaurant paid the taxes on the tip and the termination was "not a decision made lightly or hastily," as cited by the Detroit Free Press. "We do truly care about our staff. We’ve had the same crew for 5-6 years," the post said.
"We have college girls that come home every summer and have been for four years now, we take our staff up north at the end of every summer season, we give donations for college funds for them, we kept them employed through Covid, we do everything in our power not to lose staff," they added.
In an interview with WOOD-TV, Cousins shared that it would not be "logical" for them to sack their worker over the tip, and explained: "WE give chances after chances to our staff, so we clearly would not let someone go for no reason at all."
The owner assured they did not come to the decision lightly and firing an employee is something the diner tries to avoid. "In this case, it was purely a business decision," they shared.
Boyd revealed to WNDU that she "drove out of town this morning to spend time with family and get away," following her rough week.
us2 min(s) read
Published 16:20 13 Feb 2019 GMT
A former employee at KFC has been awarded around $1.5 million in damages after she suffered from workplace discrimination that made it impossible for her to breastfeed her child.
A lawsuit filed at U.S. District Court alleged that coworkers and managers at KFC and Taco bell restaurants in Kent County, Delaware made it so difficult for 27-year-old Autumn Lampkins to pump breast milk during her shifts that her supply dried up.
A jury corroborated the gender discrimination and harassment claims levelled at the fast food chains, as the lawsuit also argued that as well as not allowing her enough time to pump milk, there were so many surveillance cameras and windows that she could not do so in privacy.
On Friday, the jury ruled in favour of Lampkins, and awarded her $25,000 in compensatory damages, as well as a further $1.5 million in punitive damages. One of Lampkins' attorneys, Patrick Gallagher of Wilmington law firm Jacobs & Crumplar P.A., felt this was a huge victory for women's rights.
"It's a great day for women's rights," Gallagher said. "The jury sent a message that employers cannot treat lactating women differently in the workplace." According to the lawsuit, Lampkins was hired in 2014 shortly after giving birth to a son, and was assured that her decision to breastfeed would not be a problem.
But while it is recommended that new mothers pump milk at a rate of every two hours, Lampkins was only allowed to pump once every 10 hours. Initially deciding to pump in the bathroom, she was asked to pump in the manager's office, where there was a surveillance camera she was told couldn't be turned off.
Once her training was over, Lampkins was transferred to a KFC in Dover, where she was soon subjected to a demotion, while other employees complained that she had too many "breaks" to breast pump, as Lampkins said in her lawsuit, saying that her district manager Emily Martin said that her demotion was specifically due to her decision to breast pump.
"This was a demotion and not at Ms. Lampkins’ request. Emily Martin explicitly told Ms. Lampkins that her demotion to shift supervisor was because she was pumping breastmilk while at work."
"This willful, intentional, and unlawful gender-based harassment and discrimination violates the laws and regulations of both the United States … and the State of Delaware," says Lampkins in her lawsuit. She says she was suffering physical pain because of her inability to breast pump, and was even forced to move her baby onto formula a lot earlier than planned.
Although Lampkins was given a large lump-sum in her lawsuit victory, there is meant to be a limit to damages against employers. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission states that for even the biggest employers, the cap is $300,000.
Lampkins quit her job a few months later, once she learned that she was about to be fired after accidentally taking a customer's jacket home. An attorney for the defendant said she had no comment on the case.