AI Actress Tilly Norwood 'responds to backlash' after claims she’s 'the next Scarlett Johansson'

vt-author-image

By Michelle H

Article saved!Article saved!

A new name has emerged in the entertainment industry, but it’s one that has caused quite a stir. Tilly Norwood, an AI-generated actress, is gaining attention for her strikingly realistic appearances in videos and images, and even in showreels on social media. However, her rise has sparked outrage among major Hollywood stars who feel that this virtual creation could disrupt their careers. The backlash has reached such a level that Tilly's creator, Eline Van der Velden, was compelled to respond publicly.

Tilly Norwood, created by the AI production company Particle6 and talent studio Xicoia, has been touted as the next big thing in acting, with some suggesting she could rise to the fame of real-life stars like Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman. The AI actress has already amassed a significant following on Instagram, where she posts various content, including "screen tests" and "showreels." Despite her growing popularity, Tilly is entirely computer-generated, which has led to fierce criticism from those in the industry.

Celebrities like Emily Blunt, Whoopi Goldberg, and Melissa Barrera have voiced their concerns about the AI actress. Many worry that the rise of AI-generated performers could threaten the livelihoods of human actors, giving rise to ethical dilemmas within the industry. Emily Blunt described Tilly’s existence as "terrifying" and questioned whether this technological advancement might undermine the human connection in acting. Whoopi Goldberg echoed similar thoughts, commenting that the AI’s likeness was unsettling, as it seemed to combine characteristics of many past iconic stars.

Creator defends AI actress as a work of art

In response to the criticism, Van der Velden took to social media to clarify her intentions behind creating Tilly Norwood. She emphasized that the AI actress was never meant to replace human actors, but rather to explore new creative possibilities.


Van der Velden framed Tilly as a piece of art, similar to other technological advancements in entertainment, such as animation or CGI, which have opened up new opportunities without diminishing the value of live performances. She added that the creation of Tilly was an act of imagination, showcasing the craftsmanship involved in bringing the character to life.

Van der Velden further suggested that AI characters like Tilly should be judged on their own merits, separate from human actors. She believes that AI offers a new way to express creativity and expand the range of stories told within the entertainment industry. The creator also pointed out that as an actor herself, she understood the value of human performance, and nothing, including an AI character, could replace the skill and artistry involved in live acting.



Ongoing debate over AI in the entertainment industry

While some continue to defend Tilly Norwood as a groundbreaking innovation, the debate surrounding AI in entertainment remains heated. Critics argue that using AI to replace human actors raises serious questions about ethics, compensation, and the future of creative industries. Others have called for greater transparency regarding the creation of AI characters, with some even suggesting that the actors who inspired Tilly’s design should receive royalties.

As AI technology continues to evolve, the lines between human and machine are becoming increasingly blurred. For now, the conversation around Tilly Norwood serves as a reminder that the world of entertainment is facing unprecedented changes, changes that will likely continue to stir strong opinions for years to come.

Featured image credit: baona / Getty