US4 min(s) read
Published 16:46 27 Mar 2026 GMT
Former CIA advisor reveals 'red flags' in Erika Kirk which 'proves' she was living a lie before Charlie Kirk's death
A TikTok video posted by user @theleahfiles, who identifies herself as a former CIA advisor with two decades of intelligence experience and now the CEO of a corporate intelligence firm, has gone viral after she shared what she described as a behavioral analysis of Erika Kirk, the late Charlie Kirk’s wife.
In the video, she says her comments are “all my own opinions” and stresses that the analysis is based on her personal expertise, not any classified information.
“There are two types of liars in intel,” she explains in the clip. “You have your Joe Schmoes — they’re gonna lie to benefit themselves and to cover up. Those lies are going to look random, be it whenever there’s an opportunity and they need to lie. And then you have assets, and assets have lives built for them, so their lies come across as more of a pattern.”
She then tells viewers to keep that distinction in mind while looking at what she calls “the behavior of Erika Kirk” and the “red flags” she believes align more closely with an asset than an ordinary person.
Viral TikTok sparks debate
The TikToker points to three key moments that, in her view, raise questions about Erika, and her intentions. The first took place in 2013, when Erika Kirk, then 24, appeared in a documentary with the director of the CIA discussing the threat of an electromagnetic pulse attack.
According to @theleahfiles, this stood out because Kirk’s mother reportedly owns a defense contracting company.
“That is not f**king normal,” she says in the video. “Not only is it not normal for a 24-year-old who didn’t study this stuff to be the face of talking about EMPs, but it is also not normal to have access to the director of the CIA. You have to be incredibly well-connected and know your s**t, and yet she never talks about it.”
The second moment she describes involves a story Erika has told publicly about meeting Charlie Kirk.
According to Erika, the encounter happened by chance while she was on a pilgrimage to Israel in May 2018 - the same week the U.S. Embassy was being opened in Jerusalem.
In the TikTok video, @theleahfiles suggests this may not have been a coincidence.
“Knowing about Charlie Kirk’s faith, and divine intervention and all of those things, I’m going to call bulls**t on this,” she says. “What it looks like is that this was a planned encounter… You bump into your target, or you create a relationship without creating a relationship, so that when you do meet, it’s not so random.”
The former CIA advisor also points to Kirk’s career transitions as the third major red flag.
She notes that Erika was living in New York City at the age of 29 but flew to Arizona to interview for a non-profit position at Turning Point USA, later returning to New York to get her real estate license.
“What she says and what she does don’t add up, which means she’s living a lie,” she asserts.
The creator then claims that at the time, TPUSA executive Tyler Boyer said Erika called him directly to set up the interview, and that she was dating conservative media personality Cabot Phillips.
“It’s not by chance,” the TikToker says. “Those two people told her a lot about Charlie Kirk, and she learned about a target. Let’s just say that happened. Her target is Charlie… she learns everything about him, who she needs to be to attract that kind of man. And she plays that role, but she’s not the mastermind.”
The video ends with her suggesting that “the epicenter” of all these connections, between Erika, defense contractors, TPUSA, and Israeli links, could be Erika’s mother. “So, just my opinion again,” she concludes.
While the video has attracted considerable attention and debate online, none of these claims have been verified. They remain unsubstantiated allegations presented as personal analysis.
As the creator herself repeatedly emphasizes, the content represents her personal opinion, not official intelligence findings, and Erika has not publicly responded to the speculation.