Uncategorised6 min(s) read
Published 09:00 19 Sep 2017 GMT
Uncategorised6 min(s) read
Published 09:00 19 Sep 2017 GMT
[[heroimage||http://cdn.junglecreations.com/wp/junglecms/2017/09/the-conqueror-compressor.jpg]]
Perhaps one of the most disturbing deaths that came from The Conqueror was the case of Pedro Armendáriz, a Mexican film actor who played John Wayne’s brother in the production. Whereas some of the film's victims had discovered their doomed fates quickly, it took Armendáriz 30 years to learn the truth. When it emerged that around half of the residents of the Utah town of St George had been diagnosed with cancer and many of the area’s livestock had passed away, the veteran of the production knew he was in trouble. After being diagnosed with kidney cancer and learning that his case was terminal, he decided to spare himself the pain of a slow death and shot himself in the chest with the gun he smuggled into the hospital. So can the dozens of deaths definitely be put down to the film? Could there be another reason, aside from the nearby nuclear weapons site for their deaths? Given that it has proved difficult for scientists to definitively link radiation with cancer, the subject has divided people in the past, with sceptics pegging smoking habits and unhealthy lifestyles as an alternative justification. Statistically, the odds of developing cancer for men in the US population are 43 per cent and the odds of dying of cancer are 23 per cent, whereas for women it is slightly lower at 38 per cent and 19 per cent, respectively, so it could be argued that a fair number of cancer cases were to be expected throughout the cast and crew. However, researchers have freely admitted that the number of people who died is unnerving. Dr Robert Pendleton, professor of biology at the University of Utah, said: “With these numbers, this case could qualify as an epidemic. The connection between fallout radiation and cancer in individual cases has been impossible to prove conclusively. But in a group this size you’d expect only 30-odd cancers to develop … I think the tie-in to their exposure on the set of The Conqueror would hold up in a court of law.” So did Hughes actually have any understanding of the damage he could do by taking hundreds of people to the canon lands around St George? According to various sources, there is evidence the film producer - who was spared cancer himself - suspected the risks of radiation. In 1925, he had founded a medical and scientific researcher institution and was reported to have displayed an abnormal interest in his own health, regularly exhibiting obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Although this certainly doesn’t prove his guilt, it also does not make him irreproachable. In addition, daily extensive battle scenes were said to have taken place on set where electric fans were used to create a dusty, windswept look, meaning that the cast were caked in radioactive dust on a regular basis. There’s a chance they could have also digested some of the fine particles too; apparently food from the caterers was often hit by the same clouds of grime. Furthermore, when filming on location came to its end, Hughes transported 60 tonnes of sand from the site back to Hollywood to continue shooting, effectively meaning that an entire studio backlot was contaminated. One hopes Hughes was a man fooled by irresponsible government officials rather than a director who decided to chance the lives of his entire cast, crew and their families for a movie that turned out to be a dud. After news of the cancer epidemic came to light, the producer bought every single copy of The Conqueror for $12 million, pulling it out of circulation. It was then, in his darkened bedroom, that the unrecognisable maverick film tycoon would sit rewatching his movie on repeat. Although we’ll never know what exactly was going on in his head as he watched The Conqueror over and over again, we can certainly guess. Ultimately, there’s no question of whether he paid for his mistake.