Uncategorised3 min(s) read
Uncategorised3 min(s) read
lifestyle5 min(s) read
A father has been left outraged after his mother-in-law turned to an old-school "remedy" to help his daughter with teething pains.
Teething can be a tough time for babies, and one supposed remedy that has been passed down through the generations is to rub whiskey on their gums to numb the pain - despite scientific research showing that it's not a great idea for many reasons.
In a post shared on Reddit’s Am I the A***ole forum, the mother of the baby revealed that her mom had done exactly this to her child, and the baby's dad was pretty furious when he heard about it.
The 28-year-old revealed that her baby had been "teething horribly" and she sought advice from her own mom on how to best to soothe her while visiting her house.
She explained: "My mum does some old [fashioned] things and she’s really into herbs and natural healing and such, so she wanted to try rubbing whiskey on my daughter’s gums."
The woman said that she allowed her mom to rub alcohol on the little one's gums as she had done the same to her and her siblings when they were younger, noting: "It did seem to calm my daughter down a bit."
However, it really didn't go down well with her husband when she got home and told him as he was "furious", adding: "He said that’s harmful to our daughter and it does not relieve any pain.
"He got really upset and said I shouldn’t [have] let my mum do something like that, and told me I couldn’t bring our daughter to my mother’s anymore."
She continued: "He’s since called the next two days off of work and is super paranoid watching me every second with our daughter. I feel this is unfair."
Users on the social media platform were divided over the decision, with one commenting: "I think in the world where Internet is at our fingertips, it should be easy enough to Google if something is safe or not. I'm not a mother and even I know, without having to look it up, that some of those "old remedies" aren't safe. I'd think that a first time mother would also know that, even if the advice is coming from her own parent."
Another responded: "You'd think so, but there's a lot of misinformation out there, often disguised as 'wellness'. It's hard to figure out what's valid and what isn't if you don't already have some knowledge."
Another person stated that the mother was "NTA (not the a**hole)" in the situation, adding: "Your husbands response is actually the most concerning part of this post. Taking off work multiple days to 'watch over' your wife over something like this. This should have been an easy discussion about how that’s not the right way to handle teething and then move on. This isn’t real a big deal, the damage done to the child was literally zero. If this is how something like this is handled how are things that matter going to handled."
Someone else suggested: "I agree with you about her being a first time mom and that it's normal to go to your mom for help. I also agree that this is a mistake and she's learned not to do it again. I do think Dad needs some grace here too. As far as we know, he's also a first time parent. She let a non-medical professional give something to their six-month-old without his knowledge. And Grandma gave their baby something that can damage gums. Will it happen again? Probably not. But I think it's understandable that he's emotional and doesn't trust OP right now. If he's still micromanaging a week, a month, etc. from now, that would definitely be a red flag. I think a few days isn't."
Despite it being a common "home remedy" from decades past, according to medical professionals, using whiskey on babies to help with their teething is a big no-no.
The Pediatric Dental Association advises: "Never use whiskey or alcohol to 'soothe' gums, as this does damage the the mouth and doesn't provide relief. You may also try over-the-counter remedies, but always check with a pediatrician or pharmacist. Avoid numbing agents unless they're prescribed by a physician."
health2 min(s) read
Breakfast cereal is known for its high sugar content, but one mother was horrified to find a weight loss pill in her son's cereal.
Karlee Tweedie watched her four-year-old son Alex eat through a bowl of Coco Pops, when the youngster noticed something strange at the bottom of the bowl. Upon closer inspection, the foreign object appeared to be a pink capsule, one said to help people to lose weight.
Tweedie, who is from New South Wales in Australia, decided to post to Facebook about the incident, saying that while her son did not swallow the pill and was unharmed, she wanted to warn other mothers out there about the potential dangers at the bottom of a bowl of cereal.
"Everyone with kids who eat coco pops please be careful Alex was eating cereal and at the end we found a capsule in it. Has been confirmed the tablet is in fact Duromine."
"I made my son a bowl of cereal, he finished it and at the bottom of the bowl after he was finished was the tablet," Tweedie said, adding that the incident took place on Saturday. "I was worried and thought, what the hell is this?"
Tweedie's post has been shared on Facebook more than 3,000 times, with several mothers outlining their concern for Alex. "That's horrible," said one. "Hope he didn’t chew, swallow any and is OK."
Duromine, the weight loss pill found in Alex's cereal, is designed to be used as an appetite suppressant in small uses, and while the four-year-old was unlikely to be seriously harmed, the drug does come with side effects such as dry mouth, itching, not to mention vomiting and diarrhoea.
In response to the incident, Kellogg's, who produce Coco Pops, say they are launching an internal investigation in order to determine how the pill made its way into Alex's cereal. Adding that they had been in touch with Tweedie, they expressed doubt that the pill came from their factories.
"Along with manufacturing based on strict quality standards, we also have policies in place that prohibit employees bringing medications into the plant," said a Kellogg's spokesperson in a statement. "We are doing a full investigation with our team and are staying in touch with the consumer. Based on the available information, our food on the shelf is safe to eat."
"Our investigation found that none of the team who made this food use Duromine. It is a highly controlled prescription-only medicine. Based on this information it is highly unlikely that this happened at our factory. We manufacture all our foods to strict quality standards and want to reassure people that Coco Pops is safe to eat."
"I’m freaking out for my son that he could have eaten it," added Ms Tweedie. "I hope there aren’t any other cases. I don’t think there would be more but you can’t be too careful."
health5 min(s) read
Christmas is creeping ever closer, and if you're anything like us, you probably still have a few presents left to buy.
However, if any of those gifts are for children, a warning has been issued for parents to avoid getting any of these items - including some that could potentially be deadly.
According to the Child Accident Prevention Trust, these are the items you should never gift a child in order to prevent any unexpected trips to the ER, or - at the worst - even cause death.
One of the most dangerous items the trust warns against is anything with small, strong magnets, which may look innocuous but could actually cause serious injury or death.
It explained: "High-strength magnets can rip through a child’s gut if swallowed, causing very serious and even life-threatening injuries.
"Yet many cheaper magnetic toys from unknown sellers online can be far too strong to be safe. And may not come with safety warnings. Many have been recalled."
If you really want to buy any magnetic toys for a child, they recommend only purchasing from a reputable retailer or a trusted brand name as they are more likely to be safer than buying from a cheaper or unknown source online, which may not be made to such high standards.
They also warned that it's not just small children that are at risk of serous injuries or death from magnets, as many older children have accidentally swallowed magnets after putting them in their mouths or using them to create fake piercings.
It added: "Please teach older children about the dangers of putting magnets in or near their mouths and remind them to keep magnets away from younger brothers and sisters."
Another thing that could seriously ruin Christmas is anything with small button batteries that can be easily accessed.
The trust warned: "Button batteries can badly hurt or kill a small child if swallowed. Yet they will be found under almost every tree this Christmas."
Particular attention should be paid to any toys bought cheaply from unknown sellers online, light-up or moving decorations which are brought out for the holidays, as well as in gifts bought for other older members of the family or pets.
They also urged parents to check the packaging in case there are any spare button batteries loose inside, and to keep them in a safe place out of reach of children.
Any toys with button batteries should be checked to ensure the compartment is sealed with a screw or similar fastener to prevent children being able to gain access to the battery, and anything that doesn't have this should be kept well out of their reach.
Water beads are also a popular toy many children will be receiving this year, but they should only be played with under close supervision.
The brightly colored, squishy balls are very appealing to small children but could cause serious problems if swallowed.
Given that they retain water by design, the balls can absorb stomach fluids and swell to many times their original size, which could cause a serious bowel blockage.
The CAPT advises that they're never bought for children under the age of five, and any older children should be supervised when playing with them - ideally in a large tub with plenty of free space so stray beads can't escape onto the floor. All beads should be safely cleared away after use to prevent younger children or pets from accessing them accidentally.
Christmas is an expensive time of year, so many people consider cutting costs by buying copies of the most popular toys from cheap online retailers, often based overseas.
However, this could be setting yourself up for unknown risks as the quality is often far less strictly controlled, so the item may have cheap parts that break easily, button batteries that are easy for a child to access, hight strength magnets that could come loose, or harmful levels of chemicals.
The CAPT advises buying a smaller toy from a reputable retailer instead of a cheap copy, especially for children under three years old.
Aside from the obvious injury risks - especially when used without wearing protective helmets - these items house lithium-ion batteries which are known for starting explosive fires which can spread quickly.
Many have been recalled from sale - particularly cheap copies - and parents are advised to only buy from reputable retailers and manufacturers, and use only manufacturer recommended batteries and chargers and never leave them charging unattended or overnight.
Slime might be an incredibly popular children's toy but it can be an adult's worst nightmare, due to the mess and chance of it getting stuck to soft furnishings or a child's hair.
But the risks could run even deeper as certain slimes have been recalled for containing dangerous levels of certain chemicals including boron, which can cause irritation, diarrhoea, vomiting and cramps if ingested, and there is even concern it could cause harm to the reproductive system.
Their advice is to only buy from reputable brand names and retailers and never from unknown vendors online.
The message is clear - it's better to pay a little more for fewer items you know are likely to be safe and of higher quality than to buy hundreds of cheap trinkets from online sellers to fill up the underside of the tree, as it could end up with some seriously undesired consequences.
lifestyle6 min(s) read
A dad was outraged after his mother-in-law rubbed whiskey on his six-month-old daughter's gums to help with her teething.
In a post shared on Reddit’s Am I the A***ole forum, the mother of the baby explained the situation, revealing that her husband was not at all happy with the "remedy".
The 28-year-old wrote she was at her mother's house with their newborn - who is "teething horribly" - and sought advice from her on how to help her child.
"My mum does some old [fashioned] things and she’s really into herbs and natural healing and such, so she wanted to try rubbing whiskey on my daughter’s gums," she revealed.
The woman went on to share that because her mom rubbed alcohol on her and her siblings when they were younger, she allowed her to do it to her granddaughter. "It did seem to calm my daughter down a bit," she noted.
But the young mom said that when she got home and told her husband of the remedy, he was "furious," explaining: "He said that’s harmful to our daughter and it does not relieve any pain."
"He got really upset and said I shouldn’t [have] let my mum do something like that, and told me I couldn’t bring our daughter to my mother’s anymore," she went on.
"He’s since called the next two days off of work and is super paranoid watching me every second with our daughter. I feel this is unfair," she said, concluding her post.
Users on the social media platform were divided over the woman's dilemma. Some people commented that she was wrong for allowing her mother-in-law to rub whiskey on her child.
One user penned: "I think in the world where [the] internet is at our fingertips, it should be easy enough to Google if something is safe or not. I'm not a mother and even I know, without having to look it up, that some of those 'old remedies' aren't safe. I'd think that a first-time mother would also know that, even if the advice is coming from her own parent."
Another interjected: "YTA (You're the A***ole) yeah. I mean, you know alcohol is unsafe. It also happens not to work as a topical analgesic; if the baby quietens down, it's because of the general sedative effect of alcohol."
"I think it's hilarious how your mother conflates the use of a well-understood but completely inappropriate drug with 'herbs and natural healing'," they concluded.
A third remarked: "Gently YTA. You're 28 and a mom. You need to make your own judgments, not just listen to your mom without question. And in this case, your judgment was to let your mom give your infant alcohol. Does that sound trustworthy to you?"
Meanwhile, several others shared that her husband's reaction was "excessive" as one person stated: "Her husband literally took two days off work to micromanage parenting because of this? That’s excessive. It’s called having a conversation between two adults, saying 'we shouldn’t do this again', and moving on!"
"Dad staying home from work like she’s driving her child to alcoholism makes him TA here. Also, him trying to keep the child from grandma when grandma did it with mom’s permission is another TA move," the user continued.
A second person pointed out: "Taking off work multiple days to 'watch over' your wife over something like this. This should have been an easy discussion about how that’s not the right way to handle teething and then move on... If this is how something like this is handled how are things that matter going to handled."
A third added: "You're not some monster that's going to harm your child. Honestly, if this is how your husband is reacting, that's a red flag. He's right, it doesn't relieve pain, and if you were to start doing it regularly, yeah, it can be harmful."
"However, it was a one-time thing that you told him about, and now you know not to do it again. He shouldn't be acting like it was a conspiracy to intentionally hurt your daughter," they remarked.
According to medical professionals like Dr. Amos Grunebaum, using whiskey on babies to help with their teething is a big no-no, explaining on BabyMed: "Alcohol is bad for babies because it slows down their systems. Babies are constantly growing rapidly, so any slowing could cause serious developmental problems and defects."
"When adults drink alcohol, it has temporary negative effects, but since they are full-grown, it can’t cause any permanent harm at that moment. Babies cannot make up for the lost time of development when they consume alcohol though," he added.
So there you have it, folks, don't rub alcohol on your babies' gums!
weird1 min(s) read
When you're a parent with a sick baby, then it's reasonable that you'd try anything available to help nurse your child back to health again - no matter how strange or potentially embarrassing. This week however, one ingenious mom has managed to provoke division and controversy on social media, after using her vibrator to soothe her baby's chest congestion. Is this totally fine and acceptable, or is this completely inappropriate and wrong? The general public can't seem to agree.
The trouble began when the parenting-themed Facebook page ‘Melons and Cuties’, shared an image of a baby lying on her front, with her mother holding the sex toy next to the child's back - using the vibration to sooth them. The post was captioned: "Our customer shares her remedy for chest congestion!! Use on baby’s back while sitting in a steamy bathroom. Note that many hospitals and respiratory therapists use these in the treatment of respiratory issues on the BACK in hospital settings. It is common practice. We are just sharing the information and do NOT sell this product. *We do not support mom-shaming and those comments will be deleted. [ic]]
[[facebookwidget||https://www.facebook.com/Melonsandcuties/posts/2192825567422233:0]]
However, that didn't stop a number of commenters from expressing outrage and shock over the post. One Facebook-user wrote: "And here I am using Sudafed when I could be getting toe-curling congestion relief. Obviously not living my best life, y’all," while another added: "No thanks, not wasting my batteries on the child."
However, other people seemed to appreciate the funny side of the situation, with one commenter writing: " I tried this trick with my son, he was crying for hours one night so I chucked the Mrs’ vibrator on his back and he settled in minutes... The only problem is he now talks with a stutter." Meanwhile, someone else commented: "Explains why my girlfriend breathes so much easier than I do."
The Facebook page later posted an update in the comments section, writing: "Love hearing the stories of babies who have been helped in NICU wards and hospitals and even some who have been sent home with them. Thank you for the mostly-positive support of such an easy and practical use of something that you can find in many households. When moms are in the trenches, its the middle of the night with a sick child, this is something they may not have thought of. For those of you calling us pervs, paedophiles or worse. You have a very unhealthy view of sexuality, parenting and can 'buzz' off."
[[facebookwidget||https://www.facebook.com/Melonsandcuties/photos/a.1067734143264720/2198184746886315/]]
They added: "Thank you all for keeping the comments supportive (mostly). It’s good to see moms encouraged to use things readily available to help with wellness and not be shamed for it!"
So what do you guys think? Personally, I think that it is a little bit weird. But on the other hand, would I want a screaming baby for days on end? Absolutely not.