US5 min(s) read
A forensic psychologist and body language expert has given his standpoint on the hospital photo released by Mitch McConnell, explaining why he believes one detail in particular has fueled widespread speculation online.
The image was released after McConnell spent around a month in hospital, with conspiracy theories quickly emerging over whether the photograph had been created using artificial intelligence.
After examining the image using multiple AI detection tools, Dr. G said he does not believe the photograph itself was completely fabricated.
"Based on all of the AIs that I ran this through, it does not appear to be AI generated."
He added: "It doesn't look like an AI generated image. That doesn't mean it wasn't manipulated, but it doesn't look like something that was fabricated out of absolutely nothing."
According to Dr. G, if the image had been entirely generated by AI, its composition would have been unusual.
"If it was, they really screwed up. This would be a crazy way to compose an entirely fake picture."
One of the biggest talking points online has been the newspaper McConnell is holding, which prominently displays the date.
While many assumed it had simply been included to prove the photo was recent, Dr. G believes there may be another explanation.
"Obviously, they want to show that it is from the day where the picture was taken. They want to show this is the day you can see the newspaper."
However, he argued McConnell's grip on the paper suggests he may have been struggling physically.
"I think that he's holding it the best that he can right now."
He also questioned the unusual way McConnell was holding it.
"Have you ever held a newspaper this way? Even if you're trying to pose for a picture and you're holding it in an unusual way... I really think that's as high as he can hold it. I think that's absolutely the best that he can do right now."
Dr. G said the overall image projects weakness rather than strength.
"Typically when politicians have been injured, when they've been sick, they want to show strength."
Instead, he noted: "He can't even stand in this picture. He's sitting in a hospital bed."
According to him, the image communicates: "Extreme frailty and weakness."
He also highlighted bruising visible on McConnell's left hand, though acknowledged this could be expected following a lengthy hospital stay.
Another detail that caught his attention was the absence of McConnell's wedding ring.
"Sometimes when you're in the hospital, they're concerned your hands are going to swell... so they might remove jewelry."
But he questioned why it was still missing if McConnell had already been discharged.
"The absence of that to me speaks to how frail he really is in this situation."
Dr. G also pointed to what he believed were awkward aspects of the pose between McConnell and his wife, Elaine Chao.
Although both appear to be looking upward, he argued they are not actually focusing on the same point.
"They're not looking at the same place."
He suggested this may have been the strongest image available rather than a naturally posed photograph.
"They went with the best picture they could."
Comparing it with previous public photographs of the couple, he added: "Typically they appear a lot closer."
Instead, he felt Chao appeared to be supporting her husband.
"It looks like she is trying to prop him up so it's as good a picture as possible."
Alongside the photograph, McConnell released a written update about his health.
In it, he said: "My doctors have confirmed that I didn't break any bones or suffer a concussion. I didn't have a heart attack or a stroke. I didn't have any tumors or hemorrhages, but I was briefly unconscious."
He also revealed he had been treated for pneumonia.
"I've also had to deal with a mild case of pneumonia."
McConnell explained that he had now moved into rehabilitation.
"I've been able to move from hospital care to a rehabilitation center where I'll keep regaining my strength."
He added: "As much as it frustrates me, this process takes time."
And confirmed he would remain away from the Senate.
"On the advice of my doctors, I won't be able to return to the Senate floor to vote quite yet."
Dr. G also claimed AI detection software suggested the written statement may have been partially generated using artificial intelligence.
"The concepts were probably created by a person but the flow of it... was in fact AI generated."
He argued the omission of references to Lindsey Graham supported that theory.
"If Mitch McConnell was of sound mind and he was present and available to write his own statements, unequivocally, he would have mentioned Lindsey Graham's passing."
The expert also examined a brief section of emergency dispatch audio from the day McConnell was hospitalized.
According to the recording, emergency responders requested: "Medic 3 communications, can you find me a supervisor? CPR in progress."
Dr. G questioned whether that matched the official description of events.
"If you know anything about CPR, typically that's not done from a head injury."
He continued: "The assertion that he was briefly unconscious cannot be true unless 'briefly' means something very, very different to him than what it does to me."
While noting reports that cardiac arrest may also have been mentioned during dispatch, he said he had been unable to independently verify that claim.
Still, he concluded: "Being briefly unconscious and developing pneumonia does not seem consistent with the evidence that we have."
3 min(s) read
.webp_QQJmGo?tr=cr-345.0.1535.1190,f-webp,q-70,w-1024)
3 min(s) read
3 min(s) read
us7 min(s) read
uk3 min(s) read
funny3 min(s) read
us3 min(s) read
There have been some incredible optical illusions over the years, illustrated or otherwise, that have stumped the best of us. Our brains tend to take shortcuts to make sense of an image - while not always taking the correct route to visualising something.
However, you don't need to slave over artwork for hours on end to create an image that messes with people's minds. You could just get lucky with a photo and post it on the internet, as these Reddit users did in the thread subreddit 'confusing_perspective'..
1. Is that baby slenderman?
2. Three legs?
3. Living rug
4. Naked rider
5. This took me way too long to figure out
6. Who's that looking at me?
7. Twice the doggo
8. Taking her out for a spin
9. The mystery loop
10. Monster pooch
11. A chair designed to mess with you
Who needs any elaborate optical illusions now when you can just browse Reddit for the weirdest photos out there, from strange perspectives to perfectly-timed shots. I know that number 5 really freaked me out before my brain figured out exactly what was happening there.
A forensic psychologist has broken down the moment Judge Tony Graf was shown previously unseen footage of Charlie Kirk's death during Tyler Robinson's preliminary hearing.
He says the judge's body language reveals far more than most viewers realized.
Dr G, a forensic psychologist and body language expert who has previously analysed Robinson's own courtroom reactions, published a detailed video breakdown of the judge's behaviour while watching graphic evidence from the bench.
What he found was a man trying to remain composed while his body told a very different story.
On the first day of Robinson's five-day preliminary hearing at Provo's Fourth District Court, prosecutors submitted three videos of Kirk being shot at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025.
One was filmed from directly behind Kirk at close range.
Judge Graf agreed with both prosecution and defence that the footage was too graphic to be shown to the full courtroom or on the public livestream.
It was played only on his monitor at the bench and on shielded screens at the attorneys' desks.
The audio, including a loud crack followed by screaming, could be heard throughout the courtroom.
Kirk's widow Erika and his parents Robert and Kathryn voluntarily left the room before the footage was played.
Robinson's own monitor appeared to be turned off.
Donald Trump Jr., who attended the hearing alongside far-right influencer Jack Posobiec, remained in the gallery.
Graf was the only person in the courtroom watching the full footage, and the camera was on him the entire time.
Dr G's analysis focuses on a sequence lasting roughly three and a half minutes during which the judge watches the most graphic portion of the evidence.
The first thing he picks up on is the judge's initial physical reaction.
As the critical moment in the footage arrives, Graf's body shifts noticeably.
He moves away from the screen. Not dramatically, but enough that Dr G describes it as an involuntary distancing response.
The body's way of creating space between itself and something it perceives as threatening.
Within seconds, the judge touches his face.
Dr G flags this as a classic self-soothing behaviour, a subconscious attempt to regulate an emotional response.
Graf also adjusts his position in his chair, shifting his weight in what Dr G identifies as a startle response. Brief and controlled, but there.
As the footage continues, Graf leans back.
Dr G reads this as a continuation of the distancing behaviour.
The judge is physically pulling himself further from the source of distress without standing up or looking away.
At the same time, several secondary indicators appear.
The judge's blink rate picks up, which is a well-documented physiological response to stress. His breathing pattern appears to change.
There is visible tension across his face, particularly around the jaw and forehead, which Dr G says is consistent with someone suppressing a strong emotional reaction in a professional setting.
None of it would jump out to someone casually watching the courtroom feed.
These are subtle, controlled movements that happen within a matter of seconds.
But taken together, Dr G says they paint a clear picture.
Dr G's overall reading is that Judge Graf experienced a serious emotional reaction to the footage while still maintaining professional composure.
He did not break character. He did not say anything. He did not look away.
But his body responded in ways that suggest what he saw on that screen was deeply disturbing, even for someone whose job involves reviewing graphic evidence on a regular basis.
When the footage ended, Graf paused, gathered himself, and calmly stated: "And that concludes state's Exhibit 8."
That gap between the visible physical reaction and the measured verbal response is what Dr G describes as the most telling detail of the entire hearing.
A judge processing something profoundly distressing and choosing, in real time, to hold the room together.
Robinson, 23, from St George, Utah, is charged with the aggravated murder of Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old co-founder of Turning Point USA and a close ally of President Donald Trump.
Kirk was shot in the neck by a single bullet while addressing students at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025.
He was rushed to a local hospital and later pronounced dead.
Robinson turned himself in at a sheriff's office in southwest Utah the following day, reportedly driven there by his father.
His mugshot was released shortly after.
Prosecutors allege Robinson planned the attack, tracked Kirk's movements on campus using stairwells and rooftop positions, and confessed to the killing in text messages sent to his roommate and partner Lance Twiggs.
One message reportedly read: "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I took it."
Investigators recovered a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel near the scene.
Shell casings found at the site were engraved with disturbing messages including internet memes, anti-fascist slogans, and the phrase "Hey fascist! Catch!"
Robinson faces aggravated murder, obstruction of justice, felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, two counts of witness tampering, and committing a violent offence in the presence of a child.
Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.
Robinson's own courtroom demeanor has drawn significant attention throughout the case.
During his first in-person appearance in December, he was seen smirking and whispering with his legal team.
He was granted permission to wear civilian clothing rather than a jail-issued jumpsuit, mirroring rulings in other high-profile cases including those of Bryan Kohberger and Luigi Mangione.
During this week's preliminary hearing, the Daily Mail reported that Robinson was seen laughing at one point.
His monitor appeared to be switched off while the shooting footage was played.
The contrast between Robinson's apparent calm and the judge's visible distress while watching the same evidence has not gone unnoticed.
The five-day preliminary hearing is expected to conclude on Friday.
Judge Graf must then decide whether there is sufficient probable cause for the case to proceed to a full trial.
The bar at this stage is relatively low. Prosecutors need only show a reasonable belief that the charges are supported by evidence, not prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Erika Kirk, who attended the hearing dressed in black alongside Kirk's parents, has pushed for full public transparency in the proceedings.
Robinson's defence team has argued the opposite, citing the risk of prejudicing potential jurors.
If Graf finds probable cause, Robinson could enter a plea during an arraignment that may take place the same day.
For now, it is the judge's reaction, not the defendant's, that has become the defining image of the hearing.
A forensic psychologist saw it in the blink rate, the face touching, the chair shifting, and the three seconds of silence before Graf spoke.
Most people watching the livestream missed it entirely.
Getty has confirmed that a picture featuring Prince Archie was also manipulated, as the Royal Family continues to draw speculation and confusion.
The Royal Family, particularly Princess Catherine, have been stealing the headlines lately - though it's not because they've done something to warrant the attention.
In fact, it's what they haven't done that's caused all of the intrigue - given that Princess Catherine was last seen in public in December before a recent sighting at a farm shop.
What hasn't helped all of the speculation is Princess Catherine sharing a photo for Mother's Day that was later confirmed to be edited.
The Princess later owned up to the editing, writing: "Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother’s Day. C."
Despite her admittance, people still questioned why the photo needed to be edited... but it turns out that the Royal Family has a track record of touching up images.
Getty Images issued a note on Tuesday regarding the official family portrait taken during Prince Archie’s christening in July 2019. The portrait features the then-two-month-old son of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, per the New York Post.
Getty Images stated that the stately portrait, taken at Windsor Castle, was "digitally enhanced," though no explicit details were provided on the nature of these enhancements, as the image displayed no apparent signs of manipulation.
The portrait was captured by fashion and portrait photographer Chris Allerton, who dismissed any suggestions of tampering. "Load of cobblers. Bye," he responded to the Daily Mail, using a British slang term for "nonsense."
Allerton's photo portrays Prince Harry and Markle cradling their infant son, surrounded by their extended family, including King Charles and Queen Camilla, Prince William and Princess Catherine, Markle’s mother, Doria Ragland, and Princess Diana’s sisters.
Getty Images has yet to respond to inquiries regarding the specifics that prompted the warning about the nearly five-year-old image.
This development follows Getty's re-evaluation of an image taken in August 2022, featuring the late Queen Elizabeth II with her grandchildren, which the agency concluded had been "digitally enhanced at source."
Among others captured in the frame are Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor, James, Earl of Wessex, Lena Tindall, Isla Phillips, Mia Tindall, Lucas Tindall, and Savannah Phillips, gathered around the late monarch on a sofa.
Addressing the matter, Getty Images elucidated in a statement: "Getty Images can confirm that in accordance with its editorial policy it has placed an editor's note on a handout image stating the image has been digitally enhanced at source."
People on the internet have been left scratching their heads after a photo an owner took of their dog went viral on Twitter.
While dog pics are arguably the best thing to exist on the internet (seriously, what did we humans do to deserve those little fluffballs?), Twitter user Arthur Gubert's snap of a seemingly headless dog caused us all to do a cartoon-like double-take.
Taking to Twitter, Gubert posted a clip of his pooch in the garden - and it led to quite a horrified response at first glance.
And while his dog is likely very cute, users were more concerned as to exactly where its head was - given that there was a nasty looking scar where it should be.
He shared it along with the caption (translated from Spanish): "This is what a dog with three legs looks like licking its tail. Now you've seen it all."
The image understandably went viral and was posted across hundreds of websites, including Facebook. Naturally, users were fascinated with the image and couldn't help but comment.
One person joked: "How does he feed?", while other people seemed genuinely concerned that the dog actually had no head, with someone writing: "I'm sorry the dog has no head put him down he is probably suffering [right now]."
"I just want to know who would be sick enough to do this to any animal," a further user chimed in.
"Oh no no no no no Where Head Dog Why Cut People!!! Poor Dog Head [sic]," another comment read.
Credit: Facebook.com
Credit: Facebook.com
Credit: Facebook.comFortunately, the majority of people understood that the photo was just an optical illusion and could see the humor in it all.
"Some ppl are so gullible. That incision is his amputated leg. He is most likely biting his butt," someone wrote.
"Literally can see a part of his blue collar on the side and it's obvious his head is turned around, anyone smart enough to use their brain and eyes would know that [...]," another user added.
Credit: Facebook.com
Credit: Facebook.comAs it turns out, the poor pooch had gone through a tough time - having had one leg amputated not long before. He was turning around to lick himself when his owner snapped the 'headless' photo.
Luckily, one user found an old image of the pup, who did in fact have a head (but was missing a leg).
What did you think about the photo? Let us know in the comments!
President Donald Trump has sparked controversy on social media yet again, saying on Monday that he removed an AI-generated image that appeared to depict him as Jesus Christ due to the “confusion” it caused online, while also taking a swipe at conservative activist Riley Gaines.
The U.S. President is no stranger to causing a stir on social media, frequently posting on his Truth Social account what many would describe as “inflammatory” content, and his latest machine-generated image has whipped up quite the backlash.
Speaking to CBS News, Trump explained his decision, saying: “Normally I don’t like doing that,” but added, “I didn’t want to have anybody be confused.” He emphasised the reaction, stating simply: “People were confused.”
Earlier in the day, Trump had told reporters he believed the image, which showed him in flowing robes placing a hand on a man in a hospital bed, was being interpreted differently. He claimed it was meant to depict him as a doctor, saying it “was me as a doctor and it had to do with the Red Cross.” He later doubled down on that explanation, insisting that “most people thought” the same.
Expanding on his view, Trump said: “You had the Red Cross right there, you had, you know, medical people surrounding me, and I was like the doctor, you know, as a little fun playing the doctor and making people better,” adding, “So that’s what it was viewed as.”
He also dismissed the idea that criticism from Riley Gaines influenced his decision to delete the post. Trump said bluntly: “I didn’t listen to Riley Gaines. I’m not a big fan of Riley, actually.”
Gaines had publicly criticised the image, questioning Trump’s intentions in a post on X. She wrote: “Is he looking for a response? Does he actually like this?” and added that “a little humility would serve him well” and: “God shall not be mocked.”
However, after Trump’s interview aired, Gaines clarified that she still supports him despite her criticism. She wrote that “the truth social post missed the mark. It’s now deleted. Amazing!” and added: “I don’t get my feelings hurt easy and I know with the President it’s really not personal.”
She concluded with a more reflective message, saying: “I want to spend eternity in a real place called Heaven. I’d love for Trump to be there too. Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life. I’ll keep doing my part by speaking truth & doing my best to lead others to Christ.”
.webp_QQJmGo?tr=cr-345.0.1535.1190,f-webp,q-70,w-100)