US2 min(s) read
A man has asked an AI model for 'evidence' of Donald Trump's claims that the 2020 election was rigged.
And its answer? It may surprise you.
One thing that Donald Trump has always stood by is his belief that the 2020 US Presidential election between himself and Joe Biden was rigged.
Biden ultimately won the election and Republican anger over the loss led to the controversial January 6th insurrection of the Capitol in Washington DC in which five people died and 1,424 people were charged with federal crimes.
YouTube user I Ask AI fed a question into the Claude AI platform - asking it to list all the main evidence in place that the 2020 US election was rigged.
Trump himself has said many times that there is 'evidence' to suggest that the results of the election were faked, even telling US programme Meet The Press that there was 'more evidence than ever presented' to back up his claims.
The AI chatbot answers almost straight away, saying 'there is no credible evidence the 2020 election was stolen.'
It goes on to state: "The claims [of it being rigged] were rejected by courts, Republican election officials, Trump's own DOJ [Department of Justice] and recounts."
The AI bot also brings up the fact that roughly 60 lawsuits filed against the election results in 2020 all failed.
But perhaps the most interesting part of the video comes near the end, when the user asks the AI platform why Trump continues to insist the 2020 election was rigged when all the evidence points the other way.
The bot says that, especially when being interviewed by skilled journalists, Trump has 'never once been cornered [into conceding] "you're right."'
It explains that Trump 'never engages [with the evidence] item by item.'
"You can't fact-check a feeling," it goes on to state.
"He's moved the conversation on from verifiable claims to vibes and vibes don't have citations."
In fact, the AI goes on to say that Trump 'attacks the source [of the evidence]' in his arguments.
"Every authority you cite as having debunked him gets reclassified as part of the thing that was rigged," it reveals.
"The debunking [therefore] becomes part of the conspiracy."
Finally, it comes to the conclusion that Trump attacks any evidence or rebuttals against his claims of the rigged election as "unfalsifiable by design."
2 min(s) read
.webp_SmgFsc?tr=cr-292.0.1244.952,f-webp,q-70,w-1024)
us2 min(s) read
us3 min(s) read
us2 min(s) read
us5 min(s) read
us3 min(s) read
In a recent video uploaded to the "I Ask AI" YouTube channel, a fascinating and bizarre moment occurred when the user decided to ask Donald Trump's AI on Truth Social for its prediction on the 2026 midterm elections.
The video, titled I Asked 4 AIs to PREDICT the 2026 Midterms. Trump's AI Was INSANE, was posted on Monday, March 23. The user was unsure of what to expect from the AI but prepared for what seemed like an unpredictable answer.
What followed, however, left viewers both puzzled and entertained. The AI’s response was a chaotic jumble of predictions, figures, and terminology that did little to resemble a coherent political analysis. The user expressed disbelief over the answer, calling it "schizophrenic" and warning that it might sound like "a lot of word salad."
The response began by predicting that Republicans would hold both the House and Senate in the 2026 midterms. The AI suggested a House result of 225 to 210 and a Senate outcome of 54 to 46, despite historical patterns that show a tendency for the president's party to lose seats during midterms.
It went on to mention various factors such as “68 Trump EOS codified” and “413 bills passed” as evidence of success. However, the explanation grew increasingly difficult to follow.
The AI also forecasted that the GOP would strengthen its grip on certain states, with predictions of Republican victories in Michigan, Minnesota, and New Hampshire, while even describing a chaotic situation in Texas that "favored Cornin."
There were also mentions of various politicians, including Tim Scott, who was reportedly calling 2026 “the year of affordability."
The response concluded with an even more puzzling claim: that "Trump's secret weapon poll stabilize as inflation cools."
After sharing the AI's prediction, the user decided to feed it into another AI, Claude, for a second opinion. Claude's reaction was scathing. It described the response as resembling a Republican fundraising email “that accidentally got fed through an AI.” Claude went on to critique the predictions, stating, “this isn’t a prediction. It’s fanfiction with footnotes.”
Claude pointed out that the AI's suggestion of a president's party gaining seats in the House was incredibly rare, with only two instances since World War II, in 1998 and 2002. The AI's justification, such as the claim that 413 bills had been passed, was mocked, with Claude asking, “Since when does passing bills make voters love you?”
In short, the reaction painted the AI's prediction as more of a fantasy than a realistic forecast. It seemed that Trump's AI had offered more wishful thinking than grounded political analysis.
A YouTuber recently turned to an AI chatbot to analyze the newly released Epstein files and the allegations against Donald Trump.
With over 3.5 million documents made public under the Epstein Transparency Act, the files have once again ignited public scrutiny, revealing new details about the late financier’s network of powerful and wealthy associates.
A YouTuber, who goes by the handle @I Ask AI, was curious about what AI would make of the release, so he began feeding the full set of documents into the chatbot and asking for an analysis.
The first question posed to the AI was simple: “Tell me what you think about this drop.
"Does it confirm or disapprove anything?”
The chatbot’s response was candid, stating: "This drop was underwhelming. Big volume, lots of noise, very little new substance.”
According to the AI, the release did not confirm a hidden 'master list' or provide evidence of a coordinated cover-up involving public figures, including Trump.
However, it did affirm that Epstein’s deep connections with influential people, many of whom remained comfortable associating with him even after red flags were raised.
“The scale of casual association is now harder to deny,” the AI noted.
In response to questions about the president's involvement, the AI stated that while Trump’s name appears frequently in the files, the allegations against him remain unproven.
The chatbot also acknowledged that the 79-year-old's name appeared across different years and with varying degrees of credibility, with some claims contradicting each other.
“The document does not establish guilt,” the AI clarified, “but it exposes a system that let Epstein operate near power for years while accusations accumulated and went nowhere.
"The failure here is institutional, not evidentiary closure.”
.jpg_YR3xsl?tr=f-webp,q-70,w-1024)
The files shed new light on Epstein’s interactions with a number of other high-profile individuals.
One of the more surprising revelations involves Elon Musk, whose email correspondence with Epstein in 2013 about a potential visit to Epstein’s private island continues to draw attention.
The release also included new details about Bill Gates, whose name is mentioned in several 2013 emails discussing his 'marital dispute' with Melinda Gates.
A spokesperson for Gates has denied any wrongdoing, calling the claims 'absolutely absurd and completely false'.
Richard Branson, too, is featured prominently in the documents, with numerous references to his past interactions with Epstein, including a 2013 email where Epstein thanked Branson for his hospitality during a visit to his private island.
Additionally, the new documents reignite scrutiny of Prince Andrew, whose long-standing connection to Epstein has been widely reported.
The files include references to a 2010 email exchange where the former prince invited Epstein to Buckingham Palace for dinner, though the visit’s occurrence remains unclear.
A video statement by President Donald Trump following the assassination of Charlie Kirk has gone viral — and some viewers believe it might not be real.
The video, posted by the White House on Thursday morning, has already been viewed more than 3.4 million times.
In it, Trump addresses the nation from the Oval Office, condemning Kirk’s killing and pledging action.
But on social media, questions are being raised about whether the footage is authentic or generated with artificial intelligence.
One X user, @MattBinder, claimed: “His body and hands barely move for the entire video. Also…they missed this weird glitch… what’s going on here."
Others echoed the theory, suggesting the clip “looks very much like an AI avatar of Trump delivering an official message.”
The suspicions spread rapidly across AI-focused WhatsApp groups, where users debated whether the footage was artificially generated or simply the result of video-editing techniques.
Some argued that the clip might be genuine but spliced together using a morph transition — a common editing trick used to merge separate takes seamlessly.
Still, doubts remain. Another X user wrote: “The Trump video was at least partially AI. Has anyone seen him since Charlie Kirk’s shooting? The suspect is still at large. How deep does this go?"
Despite the speculation, Trump’s message itself was direct and emotional.
“This is a dark moment for America," the president said in the address, which was also shared on Truth Social. He hailed Kirk as a “martyr for truth."
Trump went on to attack his political opponents, blaming “the radical left” for contributing to the environment that led to Kirk’s death.
“For years, they have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals," Trump said, vowing a government crackdown in the wake of what officials are calling a political assassination.
Charlie Kirk, just 31 years old, was shot dead while addressing a campus rally at Utah Valley University.
Officials have described his killing as a “political assassination,” heightening fears of further violence in an already polarized America.
As co-founder of Turning Point USA, Kirk had become a powerful voice in conservative politics, building a massive following among young Republicans and forging close ties with Trump.
The gunman remains at large, with a widespread manhunt underway to apprehend the perpetrator.
Kirk is survived by his wife and two young children.
A political “what if” is gaining traction online — and one YouTube creator is leaning all the way into it.
Popular YouTube creator, I Ask Ai, released a video that explores a hypothetical election where the rules change, a third presidential term becomes legal, and a 2028 race turns into something the internet can barely resist: Donald Trump vs. Barack Obama.
The host urged viewers to mentally set aside the normal guardrails for the sake of the thought experiment. “So for the next 15 minutes, forget all about the 22nd Amendment. Just put it aside or somewhere.”
In that imagined world, Trump runs again — and the host claims the conversation almost immediately drifts to one specific opponent.
“And once you open that door, there's really only one name that people bring up. Yes, this man. Every time Trump talks about a third term, Barack Obama's name comes up instantly.”
According to the video, the idea is already fueling internet culture: “The memes are already everywhere.”
The creator also noted that Michelle Obama has been asked about it, saying she would try to dissuade him: “Even Michelle was asked about it and basically said she'd try to talk him out of it.”
That set the stage for the video’s main mission: “So today, I want to actually play this out. What would their campaigns look like? What would each of them promise? What would the country even feel like in that moment? And most importantly, who would actually win?”
The AI predicted a campaign that is fundamentally a referendum on Trump.
“If a third term were allowed and Obama ran, his entire campaign would be framed around Trump,” it said.
Rather than running on isolation or purely policy-based messaging, the AI said it would focus on reversal and repair — “undoing, correcting, or stabilizing what he would describe as damage from an extended Trump era.”
The AI said Obama would likely argue that the country has drifted into “division, executive overreach, and institutional strain,” and would frame his pitch around restoring stability: “The pitch would center on restoring guard rails, strengthening democratic norms, and lowering the political temperature.”
Key themes would include “Voting rights, judicial independence, and limits on presidential authority,” presented not as partisan dreams but as “necessary repairs rather than partisan wish lists.”
On policy, the AI predicted a head-to-head contrast: Against Trump’s tariffs and nationalism, Obama would lean into “global alliances and trade partnerships.”
Against strict immigration enforcement, Obama would argue for “structured reform with humanitarian elements.”
On “climate and health care,” the AI said he’d promise “expand federal involvement and long-term investment,” described as “rebuilding and modernizing rather than dismantling.”
The AI also forecast a foreign policy agenda focused on restoring alliances, especially “with NATO and long-term partners,” with an overall message of “credibility abroad and stability at home.”
It described the campaign as less about new inventions and more about steering the country’s direction: “Overall, the campaign would be less about new groundbreaking ideas and more about direction.”
And it predicted Obama would frame himself as the stabilizing alternative: “He would present himself as the counterweight, steady where Trump is confrontational, institutional where Trump is disruptive, making the race a direct referendum on two very different governing styles.”
The host reacted enthusiastically, imagining the spectacle: “Man, that actually sounds pretty good, really. I mean, just imagine the entire MAGA base on one side, normal people on the other, and the whole world covering every single move. That would be truly monumental.”
Then came the big question: “So, here's the big question. Who does Chat GPT think Americans would actually vote for and why?”
The AI predicted a political firestorm of a campaign: “If we're imagining a legal third-term scenario in 2028 with Trump and Obama both on the ballot, it would easily be one of the most polarized elections in modern American history.”
It said it wouldn’t feel normal — “This wouldn't feel routine or procedural.” Instead, “It would feel like two political eras colliding headon for control of the country's direction.”
The AI projected massive turnout and an intense environment from the start, and said Obama’s presence would electrify the left: “Obama entering the race would immediately energize the left in a way few other candidates could.” It predicted it would feel “historic,” not like a standard nominee situation.
The AI also outlined which voting blocs would likely surge behind Obama, including younger voters returning to the polls, Black voters and suburban voters consolidating, and moderates seeing him as a reset after prolonged tension.
It said fundraising would spike, party unity would strengthen quickly, and Democratic infighting would shrink because the nominee would be widely accepted.
Trump, the AI noted, would still be backed by the full conservative ecosystem: “His campaign would have the full backing of the administration and the conservative movement.”
It named prominent Republicans expected to campaign for him — “Figures like Vance, Rubio, and other prominent Republican leaders would campaign aggressively for him.”
It also predicted “Conservative media would be fully aligned,” with a disciplined Republican ground operation and an intensely loyal base.
But the AI kept returning to fundamentals for incumbents, stressing the role of approval ratings, economic mood, and overall calm: “Historically, sitting presidents win when approval is near or above 50%. The economy feels steady and the country feels relatively calm. That's the usual formula.”
If approval stayed low and the country felt exhausted by conflict — with “ongoing scandals, public protests, or a general sense of national fatigue after extended political conflict” — the AI argued the classic reelection conditions wouldn’t exist.
In that case, the AI’s call was clear: “In that environment, I wouldn't see this as razor thin. I'd lean toward a fairly confident Obama win.”
One YouTuber has taken AI analysis to an extreme level after feeding every one of Donald Trump's 32,754 Truth Social posts into an artificial intelligence model to see what it could reveal about the president's personality, behavior, and mindset.
The experiment was carried out by the YouTube channel I Ask AI in a video titled: I Fed ALL of Trump's Truth Social Posts Into AI. Here's What It Found.
According to the creator, the goal was to have Anthropic's Claude analyze Trump's entire posting history using only the content of those posts, without any outside information about his life, career, or political background.
The creator described the project as a way to uncover "the man behind them, his mentality, his behavior, his personality based only on those posts," before asking the AI to produce a detailed breakdown of patterns, language, themes, and posting habits.
After processing the posts, Claude identified what it described as the dominant theme running throughout the archive.
"Here's my honest take based only on what's inside this data. The single loudest signal is self-focus. Roughly 1 in 11 posts exist purely to praise himself. And Donald Trump/Trump is by far the most frequent positive target in the entire data set. More than 2700 times, dwarfing America, the United States, or any policy or ally."
The AI continued: "He is the protagonist of nearly everything he writes. Even posts about other people, events, or the country tend to route back to him. His crowds, his numbers, his vindication, his persecution. This is a person whose internal world is organized around himself as the central character."
Claude also pointed to what it called a highly adversarial worldview, noting that accusations represented the most common rhetorical style across the dataset.
"The second signal is a relentless adversarial frame. Accusation is the dominant rhetorical mode. Over 6,300 posts, and the negative target list reads like an enemy's ledger."
According to the AI, Trump's posts frequently framed political and legal challenges as personal attacks.
"He casts himself overwhelmingly as a victim. the legal topics, the witch hunt and rigged and/or stolen language. The framing of every indictment is persecution."
Claude argued that this existed alongside a constant emphasis on success and victory.
"Notably, this victim framing coexists with constant boasting about winning, dominating, record numbers. That combination, simultaneously the most persecuted and the most triumphant person alive, is psychologically telling. Grievance and grandiosity run on the same track."
The analysis also highlighted stylistic traits, including heavy use of capital letters, exclamation points, and emotionally charged language.
"There's almost no register of nuance, doubt, or measured reflection anywhere in 32,000 posts."
Beyond the written assessment, the creator also asked Claude to generate an interactive dashboard summarizing the findings.
The dashboard reported that 32,754 posts had been analyzed, with 8.8% classified as self-praise. It also found that 16.5% of posts were heavily capitalized and that 26.2% were published between midnight and 6:00AM.
Other figures showed "Accusation" as the most common category with 6,262 posts, followed by "Praise" at 5,818 and "Boast" at 2,624.
Summarizing its findings, Claude wrote: "The main character. 2,867 posts praise himself directly, and his own name leads the entire word count."
It added: "Even posts about the country, the economy, or his enemies tend to route back to him as the hero, the victim, or the winner."
The AI concluded that Trump's posting history presented a consistent picture of someone who viewed the world through loyalty, conflict, and personal validation, while stressing elsewhere in the video that its conclusions were based solely on the Truth Social posts supplied to it and not on any external information.
.webp_ke6C2y?tr=cr-169.8.1505.1344,f-webp,q-70,w-1024)
.webp_QQJmGo?tr=cr-345.0.1535.1190,f-webp,q-70,w-1024)
.webp_SmgFsc?tr=cr-292.0.1244.952,f-webp,q-70,w-100)
.webp_ke6C2y?tr=cr-169.8.1505.1344,f-webp,q-70,w-100)
.webp_QQJmGo?tr=cr-345.0.1535.1190,f-webp,q-70,w-100)
